The U.S. housing market is at a crossroads, and federal policy moves could meaningfully shift supply, demand, financing rules, and ultimately prices. Recent proposals under consideration aim to increase housing affordability by targeting construction, lending practices, public land use, and even how cryptocurrencies are treated in mortgage underwriting. Each of these ideas carries trade offs, and local markets like Utah will feel the effects in distinct ways. This article breaks down the main proposals, explains why affordability looks worse than simple price ratios suggest, highlights the potential risks, and outlines practical steps Utah buyers, sellers, and investors should consider.
Headline comparisons of median home price to median household income can be misleading. A quick look at long run figures shows that median household income rose from roughly $12,000 in 1975 to around $56,000 in 2015 and is estimated to be near $85,000 in 2025. Median home prices moved from roughly $38,000 in 1975 to $290,000 in 2015 and about $410,000 in 2025. At first glance that 2025 price to income multiple looks similar or slightly improved versus 2015, but the true burden of housing depends on mortgage rates, not just price multiples.
Mortgage rates were near 9 percent in the mid 1970s, dropped to under 4 percent in 2015, and by 2025 averaged in the mid 6 percent range for 30 year fixed loans. That shift in rates changes monthly carrying costs dramatically. For example, a $38,000 mortgage at 9 percent translates to roughly $245 per month in principal and interest, about 24 percent of the median household income at the time. A $290,000 mortgage in 2015 at just under 4 percent also produced a monthly payment near 24 percent of income. But a $410,000 mortgage at 6.5 percent in 2025 produces a payment closer to $2,500 per month, which can equal around 36 percent of median pre tax household income. That rising share of income explains why housing feels much less affordable even when raw price to income multiples look similar.
There are fundamentally three variables policymakers can influence: housing prices, mortgage rates, and incomes. Each lever has benefits and dangers.
Federal actions under discussion can influence all three levers above. Below are five major proposals and their likely implications for Utah buyers, sellers, builders, renters, and investors.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are government sponsored enterprises that buy residential loans from lenders, package them into mortgage backed securities, and sell them to investors. Their purchasing guidelines strongly influence which loans lenders will originate. If the enterprises expand the types of loans they buy—by more aggressively purchasing construction loans for builders or accepting loans to lower credit or income borrowers—lenders are likely to originate more of those loans.
For Utah, increased construction lending can help relieve supply constraints that have driven price appreciation in many metropolitan and suburban neighborhoods. Expanded construction financing that targets affordable product types—smaller single family homes, townhomes, and duplexes—would lower price pressure in fast growing corridors. But loosening standards too far risks reintroducing credit quality problems and higher default rates. Utah market participants should watch changes in GSE guidance carefully and evaluate new-for-sale inventory and construction starts for early signals of supply relief.
Releasing public land for private or mixed use development can expand the physical supply of buildable lots. In Utah, where terrain and conservation considerations shape development patterns, targeted releases near infrastructure corridors could enable new subdivisions or multifamily projects. However, land disposition raises environmental, regulatory, and community trade offs that vary across counties and watersheds. Municipalities and counties will still control zoning and permitting, so any federal land sales require coordinated local planning to convert raw acreage into shovel-ready housing. Investors tracking land availability, parcel rezoning, and local permitting timelines could find early opportunities if acreage becomes available near major transit or employment nodes.
Reducing programs such as rental subsidies can lower federal outlays in the short term, and in theory reduce demand pressure from subsidized renters entering homeownership markets. But cutting aid risks increasing housing insecurity for low income households and could reduce rental demand in certain submarkets, with uneven price impacts. In Utah, where the rental stock plays an essential role for workforce housing in trade and tourism hubs, subsidy cuts could increase homelessness risk and pressure municipal services. Developers and community stakeholders should consider how changes to subsidy programs would affect rental absorption and the viability of affordable housing projects that rely on layered financing.
The Federal Housing Finance Agency has directed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to consider cryptocurrency holdings in single family mortgage risk assessments. That change would allow buyers to declare crypto assets when qualifying for loans, provided those holdings can be verified and treated as stable sources of funds. For Utah buyers who hold crypto, this could enable higher qualifying balances or larger down payments. Lenders will require robust documentation, custody proof, and likely conservative haircuts to account for volatility. Mortgage applicants should expect careful scrutiny of exchanges, wallets, and tax histories when attempting to use crypto assets for qualification.
A national housing emergency declaration would allow federal officials to implement rapid regulatory changes without proceeding through Congress. Potential actions include easing permitting restrictions, releasing federal parcels, granting tariff exemptions on imported building materials, adjusting FHA underwriting rules, providing closing cost subsidies, or rolling out targeted financing incentives. The administrative route can accelerate reforms, but it concentrates decision making and can create policy uncertainty. In Utah, expedited permitting and tariff relief for materials could reduce construction timelines and cost for new builds, while closing cost subsidies could increase buyer demand in price sensitive cohorts.
These proposals present a set of trade offs. Policies aimed at stimulating supply and loosening credit can reduce short term affordability pressures, but if executed without disciplined underwriting and planning they risk rekindling credit instability or accelerating price growth in the near term. Conversely, policies that reduce demand through subsidy cuts may ease price pressure but can have serious social consequences. Utah homeowners, buyers, and investors should monitor federal rulemaking, GSE directives, construction starts data, and local permitting developments to gauge which levers are being pulled and how quickly these changes translate into inventory and price movement.
For Utah property searches and local market resources, reference the site https://bestutahrealestate.com for listings and contact information. For federal data and historical context on incomes and housing prices, consult sources such as https://www.census.gov and https://www.nar.realtor for statewide and national metrics.
A national housing emergency could speed implementation of policies like permitting reform, federal land sales, tariff exemptions for building materials, or targeted financing incentives. In Utah, expedited permitting and lower material costs could accelerate new construction and ease supply constraints in high demand areas, but local zoning, environmental reviews, and infrastructure needs will still shape where housing gets built.
Expanding GSE purchase criteria increases access to credit and can boost construction and homeownership. However, relaxing standards without prudent risk controls could encourage loans to borrowers with insufficient repayment capacity, increasing default risk. Proper underwriting, income verification, and program design are essential to avoid adverse outcomes similar to prior crises.
Accepting cryptocurrency as a documented asset could help buyers show higher reserves or down payments, but lenders will likely require rigorous proof of custody, transaction history, and conservative valuation methods due to volatility. Crypto holdings are not a guaranteed shortcut; careful documentation and timing matter.
Investors should watch GSE guidance, FHFA announcements, federal land sales, construction starts, local permitting changes, and tariff adjustments for building materials. Early signs of increased construction lending or released developable acreage often precede supply-driven price moderation. Local indicators like building permits and new inventory listings provide the most immediate signals.
The Federal Reserve executed two distinct actions that will interact to produce uneven effects across financial markets. First, the Fed reduced the federal funds rate target range modestly to 3.75 percent through 4 percent.
Contrary to popular belief, not everyone famous flocks to LA’s Beverly Hills, NYC’s Upper East Side, and other cultural epicenters known for glitz and glamor.
Avoid five kitchen trends that can hurt resale value in 2026. Utah-focused alternatives, budgeting tips, and material guidance for Salt Lake, Park City, and St. George homeowners.
Utah homeowners, buyers, and investors face a unique mix of design demands. Mountain light, wide seasonal swings, and evolving neighborhood aesthetics influence how interiors and exteriors age, show, and sell.
Access all your saved properties, searches, notes and more.
Access all your saved properties, searches, notes and more.
Enter your email address and we will send you a link to change your password.
I agree to receive marketing and customer service calls and text messages from Best Utah Real Estate. Consent is not a condition of purchase. Msg/data rates may apply. Msg frequency varies. Reply STOP to unsubscribe. Privacy Policy & Terms of Service.
Your trusted MLS search companion
